Employment and Human Resource Management Essay

Define beautyism and its potential discriminatory effects on hiring in the workplace.Beautyism is giving a person preference or hiring someone due to their outward beauty. Some research has suggested that flock who argon outwardly pleasing get hired faster, get paid more than, and receive better treatment in life in general, becoming more successful than others. While this may be true to an extent, I do believe that the opposite is also true, attractive people argon over-looked due to their outward display and are taken less seriously even when dependant or more qualified than other candidate. This is not to mention that life brings ch completelyenges, hurts, and un-pleasantries, regardless of how a person looks. So we cannot be too sprightly to say that beautiful people have better lives.In this case though, the issue is beautyism as a free-pass in a sense, or a way into a transaction position without the proper qualifications (or in spite of the proper qualifications). The re has been some evidence that people who hire for job openings do upset preference at propagation to people who are obviously physically attractive. Researchers have noted that beautiful people tend to charm interviewers with their looks and create a positive tone and impression based but off of how they look.Assess the runs behavior from a human resource commission perspective. I feel that if people try to regulate every detail of a hiring process, including the way people look, in that location lead be even more discrimination. When an exceptionally beautiful or attractive candidate is interviewed, managers may feel pressure not to hire them just so there are no lies or tension in the workplace as to why that person was hired. In this case, though, it is not even clear that the Chair made an incorrect decision. Other department members should allow the Chair to do their job and desire that they have the proper qualifications to interview and choose qualitycandidates.Ther e are times when candidates are elect without having all of the qualifications of another candidate. There are job openings available that specify that a certain level is preferred but not required. The Chair was said to have overlooked a more qualified candidate, but that does not negate the fact that this interviewee may have also been qualified. A lot of times a degree or certain qualification sets are not the besides thing be considered. A person who shows that they are able and willing to complete a job with a grand attitude may win job offers faster than a very-highly qualified person who may be lacking in other areas.Recommend the action that the hiring committee should take to handle the hiring decision. The hiring committee should do their best to work as a team and keep down conflict within the workplace. The Chair made a hiring decision and that decision should be upheld. Employees may feel that the Chair is easily swayed and break more involved in the hiring process than they are even supposed to be. What happens when someone is interviewed that a histrion just doesnt like from their outward appearance? Going to the chair to try to get a hiring decision overturned should not be a route taken too often by employees.I feel that there is already enough looks-discrimination in the workplace. When a person enters a elbow room to be interviewed they are being judged not only their answers but also how they look. Research shows that 74% of interviewers influence hiring decisions within the first minutes of an interview. They judge looks by the persons appearance, voice tone, handshake, and body-language. These are all surface characteristics There is enough judgment in interviews, applicants should not have to be subjected to on-looking, non-involved employees judgments as well. contend to what degree and why attractive candidates may be given unfair consideration during hiring processes.This question makes me wonder, honestly, if people would fee l better if attractive women or men were interviewed through a wall or only via telephone. People come in all sizes and shapes, with different features and looks. Attractive people cannot help how they look and are often not eventhinking about their looks when working or at an interview.Believe it or not, a lot of times attractive people would like a little less help based off looks when it is time to be professional. More often than not, other people are more hooked on the candidates looks than the candidate themselves are. I feel this is an extremely issue and hopefully no advancements will be made to try to control this There is no way to tell what would begin calamity in workplaces if employers try to control what they think others may be thinking about how a job applicant looks this does not fit into professionalism.ReferencesRetrieved from http//jobs.aol.com/articles/2010/05/18/pretty-girls-get-all-the-jobs/. 16 May 2012.ERG Theory. Dictionary of human resource management ( 2001) 112. EBSCO MegaFILE. Retrieved viaWeb. 5 May 2011. Muller, M. (2009) The managers guide to HR hiring, firing, & performance evaluations. New York, NY AMACOM